Pultruded Grating

FRP Grating
Pultruded Grating

Environmental Impact

Production Carbon

31.8

kgCO₂e per 1 m^2

Declared Unit

1 m^2

Valid Until

Nov 2030

Product Details

Category

FRP Grating

Plant Geography

MX

Program Operator

Smart EPD LLC

Verifier

Smart EPD LLC

PCR

Building and Construction Products and Services 1.2

Plant Address

Av. Las Misiones 21, Las Misiones, 76240 Santiago de Querétaro, Qro., Mexico

Manufacturer Website
www.fibergrate.com
Date of Issue

2025-11-03

Description

Pultruded fiberglass grating with a high glass content (~70%) providing high unidirectional strength and stiffness for longer support spans. The Safe-T-Span family covers standard, heavy-duty vehicular, and phenolic marine-rated variants. Corrosion resistance, low maintenance, and a long service life deliver a significantly lower life-cycle cost than steel grating in industrial walkways, mezzanines, and trench covers.

Lifecycle Breakdown

Method: TRACI 2.2

EPD PDF Document

Program Operator: Smart EPD®www.smartepd.comEnvironmental Product DeclarationIN ACCORDANCE WITH ISO 14025 AND ISO 21930:2017SmartEPD-2025-094-0630-01Pultruded GratingDate of IssueNov 03, 2025Expiration dateNov 03, 2030Last updatedNov 03, 2025Refer to the EPD Library at www.smartepd.com for the latest EPD listing information
Pultruded GratingFibergrateGeneral Information Fibergrate 1234 Johnson Rd, STE 366, Allen, TX 75013(800) 527-4043info@fibergrate.comfibergrate.comProduct Name:Pultruded GratingDeclared Unit:1 m2 of a pultruded fiberglass gratingDeclaration Number:SmartEPD-2025-094-0630-01Date of Issue:November 03, 2025Expiration:November 03, 2030Last updated:November 03, 2025EPD Scope:Cradle to gate with other optionsA1 - A3, A4, A5, C1 - C4, D Market(s) of Applicability:North AmericaGeneral Organization InformationFibergrate Composite Structures Inc. is the leading manufacturer of fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) solutions for industrial and commercial use globally. Fibergrate sets the standard for high-performance composite products with such proven brands as Fibergrate and Chemgrate molded grating, Safe-T-Span pultruded grating, Dynarail railing and ladder systems, and Dynaform structural shapes. As the originator of FRP molded grating, Fibergrate began manufacturing in 1966 in Dallas, Texas. Today, Fibergrate’s ISO 9001 certified manufacturing facilities in Stephenville, Texas, and Quertaro, Mexico, manufacture a full line of FRP products and structural systems using a variety of technologies.Further information can be found at:https://www.fibergrate.com/Limitations, Liability, and OwnershipEnvironmental declarations from different programs (ISO 14025) may not be comparable. Comparison of the environmental performance of products using EPD information shall be based on the product’s use and impacts at the building level, and therefore EPDs may not be used for comparability purposes when not considering the whole building life cycle. EPD comparability is only possible when all stages of a life cycle have been considered. However, variations and deviations are possible. Example of variations: Different LCA software and background LCI datasets may lead to differences results for upstream or downstream of the life cycle stages declared. The EPD owner has sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.Reference StandardsStandard(s):ISO 14025 and ISO 21930:2017Core PCR:Smart EPD® Part A Product Category Rules for Building and Construction Products and Services, 1000, v1.2Date of issue: March 14, 2025Valid until: March 14, 2030Page 2 / 11
Pultruded GratingFibergrateSub-category PCR review panel:Contact Smart EPD for more information.General Program Instructions:Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.2.0, March 2025Verification InformationLCA Author/Creator:Samuel Fafelsamuel@parqhq.comEPD Program Operator:Smart EPDinfo@smartepd.comwww.smartepd.com585 Grove St., Ste. 145, Herndon, VA 20170, USAVerification:Independent critical review of the LCA and data, according to ISO 14044 and ISO 14071:ExternalArka Panditpandit_arka@outlook.comIndependent external verification of EPD, according to ISO 14025 and reference PCR(s):ExternalArka Panditpandit_arka@outlook.comProduct InformationDeclared Unit:1 m2 of a pultruded fiberglass gratingMass:7.4322 kgProduct Specificity:Product AverageProduct SpecificProduct DescriptionFibergrate's pultruded fiberglass gratings are manufactured with a high percentage of glass, providing durability and an extremely high unidirectional strength and stiffness making it the ideal solution for application where longer support spans are required. Combine the corrosion resistance, long service life, low maintenance with the low cost of installation, and Safe-T-Span offers a life cycle cost that is significantly lower than that of metal.Further information can be found at:https://www.fibergrate.com/products/pultruded-grating/safe-t-span%C2%AE-pultruded-gratings/Product SpecificationsProduct Classification Codes:EC3 - Finishes -> Flooring -> OtherFlooringPage 3 / 11
Pultruded GratingFibergrateMaterial CompositionMaterial/Component CategoryOrigin% MassAcceleratorEUR< 10AdditiveCN, USA< 10Base monomerEUR< 10CatalystES< 10Fiberglass USA< 10Fiberglass matCN14 - 21FillerUSA< 10Flame retardantCN, USA12 - 18Metal catalystES< 10PUR ResinMX< 10Pigment dispersionMX< 10Polymer initiatorMX, TR< 10ResinMX, CN, KR, USA35 - 53Rheology modifierKR< 10SilicaCN< 10Packaging MaterialOriginkg MassPlastic hdpe NoneSteel generic NoneWood pallet 0.01Hazardous MaterialsPolymerized Resin (None)Fiberglass (65997-17-3)Glass Oxides (None)Page 4 / 11
Pultruded GratingFibergrateEPD Data SpecificityPrimary Data Year:09/01/2024 - 08/31/2025Manufacturing Specificity:Industry AverageManufacturer AverageFacility SpecificAveraging:Averaging was not conducted for this EPDSystem BoundaryProductionA1Raw material supplyA2TransportA3ManufacturingConstructionA4Transport to siteA5Assembly / InstallUseB1UseNDB2MaintenanceNDB3RepairNDB4ReplacementNDB5RefurbishmentNDB6Operational Energy UseNDB7Operational Water UseNDEnd of LifeC1DeconstructionC2TransportC3Waste ProcessingC4DisposalBenefits & Loads Beyond System BoundaryDRecycling, Reuse Recovery PotentialNote:ND = Module not declaredPage 5 / 11
Pultruded GratingFibergratePlantsQueretaroAv. Las Misiones 21 76240 El Marqués Querétaro MexicoProduct Flow DiagramSoftware and DatabaseLCA Software:SimaPro v. 10.2LCI Foreground Database(s):Ecoinvent v. 3.11LCI Background Database(s):Ecoinvent v. 3.11A foreground LCI database is the database used to model the primary, site-specific data collected for this EPD. A background LCI database is the database used to model generic or non-specific data.Data QualityPage 6 / 11
Pultruded GratingFibergratePrecision & Completeness• Precision: Inventory data were directly measured, calculated, or conservatively estimated from primary sources using consistent units and QA checks. Background processes from ecoinvent v3 were adopted with their documented uncertainty/precision metadata where available, preserving a transparent record of data quality.• Completeness: The product system’s mass and energy balance, as well as inventory completeness, were verified. Minor exclusions deemed immaterial under ISO 21930 7.1.8 were applied, including personnel impacts, R&D activities, business travel, and point-of-sale infrastructure. No data were intentionally omitted.Consistency and Reproducibility• Consistency: Primary data for all modules were consistently gathered aiming at the highest level of detail possible. Background processes were modeled mainly with the ecoinvent database. The same allocation rules, cut-off criteria, and impact assessment methods were applied throughout, ensuring methodological coherence and consistent data quality across the entire LCA model.• Reproducibility: This study ensures reproducibility by providing comprehensive disclosure of inputoutput data, dataset choices, and modeling approaches. A knowledgeable third party should be able to approximate the results using the same data and modeling methods.Representativeness• Temporal:Primary data were collected over a 12-month period representing the 2024 calendar year. Secondary data from the ecoinvent v3 database are representative of recent reference years.• Geographical:Primary data reflect the actual production facilities. Where relevant, differences in electricity grid mixes were accounted for, using appropriate secondary datasets. Country-specific data were used whenever available to ensure high geographical representativeness, while proxy data were applied only when necessary.• Technological: Primary and secondary data were selected to reflect the actual technologies used, ensuring high technological representativeness..Data SourcesDatabaseEcoinvent 3.11Life Cycle Module DescriptionsModules A1A3:The LCA model covers the manufacture of raw materials and components for the products (A1), followed by transport to production or assembly facilities primarily by truck (A2). The manufacturing stage (A3) begins with receipt of these materials and includes operations such as cutting, forming, molding, machining, surface preparation, and final assembly into finished components or systems.Modules A4A5: Once manufacture is completed, products are shipped to distribution centers and then to the end user by truck (A4). For installation (A5), no material installation loss was assumed, conservatively. This module includes disposal of that waste and of the product packaging.Modules C1C4 and D: At end of life (C1C4), the product is assumed to be collected, and landfilled (as per the PCR regional default. Loads and benefits beyond the system boundary are considered in Module D (e.g., displacement of virgin materials from packaging waste recycling).LCA DiscussionAllocation ProcedureAllocation of co-products was avoided, to the extent possible, based on the guidance given in ISO 14044:2006, 4.3, and in ISO 21930:2019. Utilities used at the facility level were allocated by mass. The manufacturing process does not consume water or generate wastewater or air emissions, other than those from fuel combustion. Solid waste was estimated using packaging masses and material losses and allocated following the polluter pays principle.Cut-off ProcedureFor the processes within the system boundary, all available energy and material flow data have been included in the model. Cut-off criteria, however, were applied to exclude capital goods and infrastructure, personnel impacts, R&D activities, business travel, and point-of-sale infrastructure, as these are assumed to not significantly affect LCA results nor conclusions.Page 7 / 11
Pultruded GratingFibergrateRenewable ElectricityEnergy Attribute Certificates (EACs) such as Re-newable Energy Certificates (RECs) or Power Pur-chase Agreements (PPAs) are included in the baseline reported results:NoScenariosTransport to the building/construction site (A4)A4 ModuleFuel Type:DieselVehicle Type:Truck and TrailerTransport Distance:755 kmCapacity Utilization:33 %Packaging Mass:0.01388 kgWeight of products transported:7.446 kgCapacity utilization volume factor:1Assumptions for scenario development:Transport distance includes finished product to distribution center and distribution center to point of sale.Installation in to the building/construction site (A5)A5 ModuleMass of Packaging Waste Specified by Type:0.01388 kgBiogenic Carbon Contained in Packaging:0.003881 kgAssumptions for scenario development: End of Life (C1 - C4)C1 - C4 ModulesCollection ProcessCollected with Mixed Construction Waste:7.432 kgRecoveryLandfill:7.432 kgPage 8 / 11
Pultruded GratingFibergrateResultsEnvironmental Impact Assessment ResultsTRACI 2.2per 1 m2 of product of a pultruded fiberglass grating.LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks.Impact CategoryMethodUnitA1A2A3A4A5C1C2C3C4DGWP-totalTRACI 2.2kg CO2 eq3.18e+15.18e-19.43e-402.65e-202.15e-2-4.21e-3GWP-fossilTRACI 2.2kg CO2 eq3.17e+15.18e-19.00e-402.64e-202.15e-2-4.29e-3GWP-biogenicTRACI 2.2kg CO2 eq3.02e-22.29e-44.28e-506.19e-602.90e-68.13e-5GWP-lulucTRACI 2.2kg CO2 eq1.77e-23.56e-43.59e-801.20e-502.35e-6-1.03e-6ODPTRACI 2.2kg CFC-11 eq6.67e-57.14e-91.42e-1203.77e-1003.19e-10-3.00e-11APTRACI 2.2kg SO2 eq1.67e-11.71e-35.53e-708.29e-501.73e-4-1.30e-5SFPTRACI 2.2kg O3 eq2.42e+03.70e-21.54e-501.85e-305.38e-3-1.91e-4EP-freshwaterTRACI 2.2kg P eq4.37e-34.59e-51.07e-601.88e-606.18e-7-4.96e-7EP-marineTRACI 2.2kg N eq2.11e-23.18e-42.64e-701.58e-504.51e-5-1.69e-6Note:Not all abbreviated indicators listed below may be present in the results above. The inclusion of indicators varies based on PCR requirements.Abbreviations:GWP = Global Warming Potential, 100 years (may also be denoted as GWP-total, GWP-fossil (fossil fuels), GWP-biogenic (biogenic sources), GWP-luluc (land use and land use change)), ODP = Ozone Depletion Potential, AP = Acidification Potential, EP = Eutrophication Potential, SFP = Smog Formation Potential, POCP = Photochemical oxidant creation potential, ADP-Fossil = Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources, ADP-Minerals&Metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources, WDP = Water deprivation potential, PM = Particular Matter Emissions, IRP = Ionizing radiation, human health, ETP-fw = Eco-toxicity (freshwater), HTP-c = Human toxicity (cancer), HTP-nc = Human toxicity (non-cancer), SQP = Soil quality index.Comparisons cannot be made between product-specific or industry average EPDs at the design stage of a project, before a building has been specified. Comparisons may be made between product-specific or industry average EPDs at the time of product purchase when product performance and specifications have been established and serve as a functional unit for comparison. Environmental impact results shall be converted to a functional unit basis before any comparison is attempted.Any comparison of EPDs shall be subject to the requirements of ISO 21930 or EN 15804. EPDs are not comparative assertions and are either not comparable or have limited comparability when they have different system boundaries, are based on different product category rules or are missing relevant environmental impacts. Such comparison can be inaccurate, and could lead to erroneous selection of materials or products which are higher-impact, at least in some impact categories.Resource Use Indicatorsper 1 m2 of product of a pultruded fiberglass grating.IndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5C1C2C3C4DRPREMJ2.28e+11.79e-12.08e-505.06e-302.30e-3-1.12e-3RPRMMJ2.77e-10000000RPRTMJ2.31e+11.79e-12.08e-505.06e-302.30e-3-1.12e-3NRPREMJ4.20e+27.17e+01.21e-303.73e-102.72e-1-4.46e-2NRPRMMJ00000000NRPRTMJ5.02e+27.17e+01.21e-303.73e-102.72e-1-5.38e-2SMkg00000000RSFMJ00000000NRSFMJ00000000REMJ00000000ADP-fossilMJ5.02e+27.17e+01.21e-303.73e-102.72e-1-5.38e-2FWm36.46e+04.43e-2-9.14e-501.99e-306.18e-4-4.47e-4Note:Not all abbreviated indicators listed below may be present in the results above. The inclusion of indicators varies based on PCR requirements.Abbreviations:RPRE or PERE = Renewable primary resources used as energy carrier (fuel), RPRM or PERM = Renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, RPRT or PERT = Total use of renewable primary resources with energy content, NRPRE or PENRE = Non-renewable primary resources used as an energy carrier (fuel), NRPRM or PENRM = Non-renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, NRPRT or PENRT = Total non-renewable primary resources with energy content, SM = Secondary materials, RSF = Renewable secondary fuels, NRSF = Non-renewable secondary fuels, RE = Recovered energy, ADPF = Abiotic depletion potential, FW = Use of net freshwater resources, VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds.Page 9 / 11
Pultruded GratingFibergrateWaste and Output Flow Indicatorsper 1 m2 of product of a pultruded fiberglass grating.IndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5C1C2C3C4DHWDkg00000000NHWDkg1.32e+003.05e-30007.43e+00HLLRWkg00000000ILLRWkg00000000CRUkg00000000MRkg2.04e-209.36e-300000MERkg006.95e-400000EEMJ001.07e-200000Note:Not all abbreviated indicators listed below may be present in the results above. The inclusion of indicators varies based on PCR requirements.Abbreviations:HWD = Hazardous waste disposed, NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed, RWD = Radioactive waste disposed, HLRW = High-level radioactive waste, ILLRW = Intermediate- and low-level radioactive waste, CRU = Components for re-use, MFR or MR = Materials for recycling, MER = Materials for energy recovery, MNER = Materials for incineration, no energy recovery, EE or EEE = Recovered energy exported from the product system, EET = Exported thermal energy.Interpretation• The manufacturing of the products in this analysis involves the direct procurement of raw materials from suppliers. These materials are then transported to manufacturing facilities where they are stored, processed, and combined to produce finished products. Notably, the product stage (stage 1) has the highest impact contribution, mainly attributed to the combined environmental impacts associated with raw material manufacturing and energy used in manufacturing the products.• For products with significant manufacturing energy impacts, the shift to renewable energy sources is recommended.• Given that the raw materials used in product manufacturing have a significant impact, exploration of opportunities to substitute these materials with alternatives that have a lower environmental impact. Additionally, consideration should be given to collaborating with suppliers who employ sustainable manufacturing techniques or integrate more renewable energy into their production processes. Such initiatives can lead to more environmentally friendly products and further enhance the sustainability of the products in this analysis.0%20%40%60%80%100%GWP-totalGWP-fossilGWP-biogenicGWP-lulucODPAPSFPEP-freshwaterEP-marineProduction (A1 - A3)Construction (A4 - A5)End of Life (C1 - C4)Additional Environmental InformationNonePage 10 / 11
Pultruded GratingFibergrateReferences• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2006). ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management Life cycle assessment Principles and framework. Geneva: ISO. (Amendment 1:2020; confirmed current 2022)• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2006). ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management Life cycle assessment Requirements and guidelines. Geneva: ISO. (Amendments 1:2017 and 2:2020 included; confirmed current 2022)• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2017). ISO 21930:2017 Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works Core rules for environmental product declarations of construction products and services. Geneva: ISO• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2019). EN 15804:2012+A2:2019 Sustainability of construction works Environmental product declarations Core rules for the product category of construction products. Brussels: CEN. (Including AC:2021)• SMART EPD. (2019). Smart EPD Part A PCR Standard 1000, version 1.2. March 14, 2025.• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2006). ISO 14025:2006 Environmental labels and declarations Type III environmental declarations Principles and procedures. Geneva: ISO• PR Sustainability. (2022). SimaPro 9 LCA Software [Computer software]. Amersfoort, The Netherlands: PR Sustainability B.V. (Version 9.5 used for LCA modeling)• ecoinvent Association. (2022). ecoinvent data v3.9.1 [Life Cycle Inventory database]. Zurich, Switzerland: ecoinvent. (Database version for background LCI data; latest update as of 2022)• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC [V. Masson-Delmotte et al. (Eds.)]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Source of 100-year GWP factors; AR6 latest values)• US EPA (2024). TRACI Version 2.2 TTool for Reduction and Assessment of Chemicals and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI). [https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/tool-reduction-and-assessment-chemicals-and-other-environmental-impacts-traci](https://www.epa.gov/chemi-cal-research/tool-reduction-and-assessment-chemicals-and-other-environmental-impacts-traci?utm_source=chatgpt.com)• Andreasi Bassi, S., Biganzoli, F., Ferrara, N., Amadei, A., Valente, A., Sala, S., & Ardente, F. (2023). Updated characterisation and normalisation factors for the Environmental Footprint 3.1 method. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. (JRC Technical Report EUR 31414; details of EF 3.1 method and factors)Page 11 / 11